View Single Post
06-27-2008, 01:18 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,804
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Capitano View Post
We lacked a physical presence in the Philly series...Holik isn't the player he used to be, but I would take him over Smolinski anyday.
I'd say Montreal didn't have sufficient offense to put the team over the top to win.

And the team didn't have sufficient defense to shut down a rather unimpressive, albeit deep, group of Philly forwards.

And the team didn't have the goaltending that made the game-changing stops.

I don't think grit enters the equation. Montreal's not a gritty team. It won't be a gritty team if Holik is signed. And signing Holik because he's a better option than Smolinski isn't a justifiable reason to throw money at Holik--especially given that Chipchura can and ought to be taking Smolinski's spot anyhow.

Mike8 is offline   Reply With Quote