View Single Post
07-03-2008, 10:02 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Queens, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 5,381
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by PukkuMikku View Post
Wasting money on 37 year old players is not smart. Jagr wants multiple years, not one year. And Sundin already said he is uncertain about his future, he needs time.

If you can land a winger of the caliber of Vermette for relatively cheap, you do it. It doesn't matter what your need is on defense, you do it. And worry about the defense at the same time. One has NOTHING to do with the other.

in the salary cap world everything has to do w/ each other. That statement proves to me that you know nothing about allocating money and assets. You have a hard on for Vermette and don't care about anything else.

You spend more on forwards, than you have to spend less on defense, and goal. And same goes w/ every other combination in between.

If jagr or Sundin sign a one year deal, it is a better option. Actually any one year deal for a top 6 would be better than vermette. We keep assets that we can use, and also let the players that WE DRAFTED, who play in HFD in OUR SYSTEM to play for US.

and its kind of funny how you completely avoid the statement of we don't have anything that Ottawa needs and that we would be in a cap mess in the coming years w/ too many people getting big contracts.

DontStepanMe is offline   Reply With Quote