View Single Post
Old
07-03-2008, 07:47 PM
  #60
Forever Blue
Registered User
 
Forever Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 1,042
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Steinbrenner View Post
If they didn't want Jagr back your telling me Markus Naslund is the backup plan? I just don't see it...If Jagr was plan B or plan C the Rangers didn't have to make it so obvious...They screwed themselves..
It's not a coincidence that everyone who seems to be against this are the same people that don't understand what's going on.

This idea that Naslund is somehow the "replacement" for Jagr is ridiculous. They're not replacing Jagr with one player. It's a change in philosophy. There's not going to be one guy who filled the role Jagr filled, because that role has been eliminated. It's more of a team now, not just one guy that they're going to build around.

Forever Blue is offline   Reply With Quote