View Single Post
Old
07-10-2008, 10:02 AM
  #23
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,701
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobMarleyNYR View Post
Eklund is a guy you don't bother reading. Brooks is an educated Eklund. Fischler, like it or not, is a good hockey writer.
I think he once was a good hockey writer, I'm not so sure about now. Maybe he says some outrageous things just for the attention, I don't know, but he doesn't come across as particularly with it these days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Why does it matter that he is 72?

Reading some of the comments here, like he is a hack, makes me laugh because Fischler is a many times over published author and nowadays everyone with a blog deems themselves an author.
Again, he says some pretty off the wall things these days (not talking about this article), so I don't think his credibility lately is really all that high. He's kind of settled into the role of "amusing diversion".

I'm kind of amused that someone claimed the Rangers themselves sent Fischler to write a "hit piece", though

Levitate is offline   Reply With Quote