View Single Post
07-14-2008, 01:45 PM
NYR Viper
NYR Viper's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 27,265
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Rags225 View Post
just curious but why would you put two players w/ offensive potential (cally, sjo) w/ w/ maybe the worst offensive center in hockey thus negating their offense, and put two players w/ very limited offensive potential w/ a center who has some offensive potential thus negating that.


would make more sense on the bottom 6. this way you would have three lines who can score, and one who doesn't rather than only 2 lines like you put up.
i did it because i dont see callahan as having much offensive potential at the nhl level.....also, i think voros has more offensive ability than many believe.........lastly with the loss of shanahan, straka and avery i think players like sjostrom, callahan, betts and drury will be getting more and more pk time, which adds up when it is a physical game, like the rangers in most instances i would see the third line and the 4th line only having a couple minutes difference in ice time

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote