Forsberg, Joe or Sundin - Who would you take in their prime!?
View Single Post
08-06-2008, 10:48 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Originally Posted by
Yeah, but Forsberg "prime" consist of a consistent season + some stretches of brillance between injuries while Sakic's prime consist of a contiuous 15 years of pure brillance. I don't think the choice is too difficult here.
If you take Forsberg in his prime that means that you'd have him only for a complete year while you'd have Sakic for 15 years in his prime. You just cannot take injuries out the equation in my opinion. Forsberg was dominant and probably would have been more dominant then Sakic without all the injuries, but we'll never know for sure because, actually, he was never better than Sakic except for one little season.
I have a feeling the original poster meant "Peak", not "Prime". Meaning the player during his best year vs the other player in his best year.
If the argument is prime, then Sakic has a clear margin of victory. peak is another matter, and is very close between him and Forsberg
View Public Profile
Dark Shadows's albums
Visit Dark Shadows's homepage!
Find More Posts by Dark Shadows