View Single Post
08-07-2008, 10:03 AM
Registered User
JordanStaal#1Fan's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Asbestos, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,888
vCash: 1012
Originally Posted by infinitesadd View Post
My point still stands. Forsberg was the better player in his prime. Injuries or not. Just like Mario missing 20 games in a season and domination the rest of the year. Yea, Mario was hurt, doesn't diminish his greatness. The same for Forsberg.

And no, I am not saying Forsberg is anywhere near Mario, I'm comparing the injury arguement.
Fair enough, but I don't think Forsberg was better than Sakic when we compare both players peak value. That is my opinion and I stand by it but I respect yours. Anyway, it is very close between those two.

JordanStaal#1Fan is online now   Reply With Quote