View Single Post
Old
08-08-2008, 03:22 PM
  #38
Son of Steinbrenner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pld459666 View Post
I think that alot of folks are going to be surprised to see the benefit of NOT having Jagr in the line up in that our shooters are now free to shoot be that from the circle or from the point on the PP.

No longer will the Rangers have to funnel their offence through Jagr as it will be done more on a committee basis which in my opinion can only make the team better not worse.

I'm totally excited to see the benefits of a Jagrless team
huh?

Jagr didn't play all 60 minutes of games...Didn't the Rangers have scoring troubles on all lines not just the Jagr line? (who still led the team in scoring while mentoring Dubinsky....how do you see Dubinskys production next season?)

Also...

Didn't Jagr always end up with the other teams top defenseman on him...won't that hurt Gomez who will now be forced to go up against the other teams top defenseman and forwards?

Benefits of not having Jagr??? Jeez, I've seen it all....

Son of Steinbrenner is offline   Reply With Quote