View Single Post
Old
09-13-2008, 05:12 PM
  #39
Darth Sidious*
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,524
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradox View Post
Let's see who Pittsburgh could have taken instead:

Toews
Backstrom
Kessel
Brassard
Okposo
Mueller

Most teams would probably rather have ANY of these players except maybe Brassard. Staal is always going to be a third liner as long as he's in Pittsburgh, and even on other teams he's just barely good enough to be a 2nd liner. Just doesn't have the same offensive skills as the players taken before him. His rookie year he got lucky with a high shooting percentage and a lot of shorthanded chances. He will probably end up being a 45-50 point player in his prime, paling in comparison to the players taken after him, and hardly the numbers one would expect from a #2 overall pick. I think it's fair to say that Staal was both a draft bust AND a poor choice considering who went after him.


Wow...just...wow.

Darth Sidious* is offline   Reply With Quote