View Single Post
09-16-2008, 09:00 PM
Registered User
shortcat1's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Downtown Palau, ON
Country: Palau
Posts: 896
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by sampollock View Post
well is his young, and needs to prove himself...

why would be classifed #1.

he has to earnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn it.
I'm not concerned about him being classified #1. I agree that he's young.

As to proving himself, don't they all have to do that on a yearly or even game-to-game basis? Even Brodeur's being considered #1 is always challenged by the others.

By the way, I still feel that Lundquist is over-rated. He is really good but I don't think he's as good as he's classified here. I don't have very much upon which to base my opinion so, an opinion only it remains.

shortcat1 is offline   Reply With Quote