View Single Post
Old
07-03-2004, 08:30 PM
  #23
Kodiak
Registered User
 
Kodiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ranger fan in Philly
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Kodiak Send a message via AIM to Kodiak Send a message via Yahoo to Kodiak
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prucha73
The bottom line is:

-Conroy got 8 goals playing on the top line with Iginla
-Rolston got 19 goals playing on a 3rd line with the likes of Axelsson and Lapointe

-Rolston is more versatile: can play LW and C and a point on the PP
-Rolston is younger, bigger, faster and has success in the East
-Rolston has a big shot and he shoots more
-both are great penalty killers

So I would take Rolston
I'd take Conroy because:

- Conroy is more reliable offensively. He may have only had 8 goals, but he's always been more of a playmaker than a goalscorer. Conroy can create his own chances. Rolston's only weapon is his big shot, and he tends to run hot and cold.
- Conroy is a better playmaker. We haven't had a playmaking center since the days of Gretzky and Savard. He may not mesh as well with Jagr as Rolston would, but Conroy would do wonders for the development of our young wingers. Someone like Balej wouldn't have to create all of his chances entirely on his own.
- Defensively, it's a wash. Either would greatly help our PK.
- Most importantly, Conroy is a better leader. He had been captain of the Flames until he decided that Iginla had grown enough to take the role. If he signed here, he'd be the top choice for captain (certainly better than Holik or Jagr, not that that's saying much).

Kodiak is offline