View Single Post
Old
10-21-2008, 12:29 PM
  #55
pitseleh
Registered User
 
pitseleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,644
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rover View Post
Ouellet had negative value and we were forced to take him to get o'brien. Canucks didn't want ouellet, cause he sucks.
But that's what I mean. If they wanted to save money on AHL salaries, they would have recalled Ouellet too (or not involved him in the trade in the first place). Or why not recall Jeff Cowan? He's more useless and not even helping the Moose but there's a good chance he gets claimed for half his salary by some team close to the cap in need of depth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ditch View Post
Look at my post on the other page, also you would have to wait for an injury to your forwards, and depending on which forward was injured you wouldn't have brought up Pettinger anyways.
Not necessarily. If they were bringing him up just to get claimed by another team, it wouldn't really matter where on the depth chart the injury happened as you could find a way to fit him into the lineup.

pitseleh is offline   Reply With Quote