View Single Post
10-24-2008, 03:07 AM
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montreal
Country: India
Posts: 512
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to nikrag03*
Originally Posted by Erika Kostitsyn View Post
The fact is, more people like loves him than you think. Like it or not, he would've help this team in thi series an could play with Koivu and Kovalev insted of useless players like Higgins, Latendresse, Lapierre, Ryder, Begin, Dandenault, Smolinspuke and so on.

Useless players like Higgins? Perezoghin had his cahnce and didn't do ****. Higgins is a good player, yes it would be nice if he could finish off more chances but he still got 27 goals and is very good defensively. He brings much more than Perezhogin did.

And btw Latendresse is playing well so far too.

Originally Posted by Erika Kostitsyn View Post
If Chris Higgins can put around 55 points a year playing on the first line, Alexander Perezhogin can pretty much do it too, given his skills, shots, speed and forechecking abilities.

Higgins is stronger, wins more battles in the corners, is willing to take more punishment and go to the net more, and he's better without the puck than Perezhogin and works harder.

Perezhogin did play on our first line at times and didn't do much. Comparing him to Higgins is hilarious. Also, Higgins loves Montreal and wants to win here, he's the type of player who is a leader and winner. Those are the types of players u need to win the cup.Ask any gm or coach around the league who they would rather have. Perezhogin also got knocked off the puck pretty easily.

I wish Higgins could finish a little better too, but please don't tell me Perezhogin is a better player. What a joke.

Last edited by Galchenyuk x 27: 10-24-2008 at 03:22 AM.
nikrag03* is offline   Reply With Quote