View Single Post
07-07-2004, 02:46 PM
Son of Steinbrenner
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Tromelin
Posts: 9,577
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Melrose_Jr.
I'm still not sure how. Point out an instance where censoring Holik would have lead to a positive outcome for the Rangers. At very least, point out how his comments lead to a negative outcome.
i think you guys are missing the point. I could care less what holik said in the past. Half the time i was hoping it would spark something out of the team. Name an instance where not censering has lead to a positve outcome for the rangers? I don't need to argue my case here you guys do. If holik would shut up about his role and whats wrong with the team and play and concentrate on his game it will only make him a better player.

If the Rangers were winning he wouldn't be complaining. Holik needs to be a leader for these younger players. Showing them how to complain to media isn't a leader. It doesn't matter if what he is saying is the gods honest truth.

Son of Steinbrenner is offline