View Single Post
Old
11-04-2008, 10:18 PM
  #64
le_sean
Registered User
 
le_sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Country: Vatican City State
Posts: 14,976
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxpac View Post
2 things have to be very clear

1. 3 years of Streit > 1 year of Lang

2. Streit is not that bad defensively, he was simply put in a situation where he coudn't take any risk or else he was going back up front, He was mighty fine in his zone saturday, with Georges as a partner, Streit could of been to Josh what Markov is to Komisarek.With Barker, that would be one problem solved, Barker is only 22 and in 2 years he should become a top-2 defensmen
I think the Habs had a much bigger need for a Lang than they did a Streit. No Lang means Chipchura and Lapierre on the 3rd line, which brings down the offence this team focuses on. Streit had no room on this team, he's a 4th line, borderline 3rd liner. Gorges, Bouillon and O'Byrne are all better defensively. I just don't see the fit.

le_sean is online now   Reply With Quote