Why is it always Guillaume that copes?
View Single Post
11-19-2008, 06:55 PM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Originally Posted by
Well, if this is the case, you're busted because Guillaume got a point before being demoted, basicly, doing great at least 6 games, being less good for 2, then having a good game once is enough to deserve on being demoted? I would not want you as a coach
He had 1 point in 4 games during Higgins return in the lineup while still playing with Koivu, and he'd been 1 point in 5 prior. He wasn't producing offensively.
Listen, if you actually bothered reading my other posts, I've argued that I don't think Lats necessarily deserved to be demoted, but the argument can definitely go both ways. As soon as Lats plays bad he gets demoted, but at the same time he's simply not making a good enough cause for him to be playing top line minutes. It's a vicious circle in which both parties are to blame, like I mentioned before.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by HotPie