Thread: Matt Carle
View Single Post
12-01-2008, 04:04 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,684
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by smacklby View Post
i'm not even going to answer your question, since there is no sense to it, at all....

otherwise, i was just pointing out the obvious observation, and not making an issue out of it, just to set things straight.... nor am i disappointed in Carle, at all.... regardless, if he reads and reacts quicker on Samsanov, he would have been capable of preventing him from getting to our crease; that's all i was saying....
No sense?

Not all goals are because of bad defensive zone plays. Sometimes you have to give credit to the offensive player for slipping free, also.

Not every goal is because of a bad defensive play, and as such not eveyr goal is because of a great offensive play.

Samsonov is a slippery player - he got free for a moment and poked one in. It's easy to say he should have been covered - it's not like Carle thought "Nah, screw Samsonov he won't score" and purposely lost him. He's a hard player to keep up with - to his own credit.

thedjpd is offline   Reply With Quote