View Single Post
Old
12-03-2008, 09:31 PM
  #29
Raffl House
Registered User
 
Raffl House's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,849
vCash: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dig Out Your Soul View Post
They wouldn't fork out the cash for him, so I doubt they fork out the cash and players and picks for him two seasons later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyers84 View Post
Would it really be wise to trade Danny?

All in all the guy has the potential to be what he was in Buffalo. If he gets the proper recoop time and rest he still has the potential to be deadly.
And why trade him NOW? We would have to give him away at this point. Doesn't he also have a no-movement clause?

Right now, his value is about as low as it can go. He has a massive amount of time and money left on his contract, with lingering injury issues coming off a subpar year. In 2-3 years, it would be easier to trade him. Otherwise, we are stuck with Danny. We just need to be supportive and the Flyers need to stop bringing back players too soon from injuries. I've had enough of Lindros, Forsberg, and now Danny being rushed.

Raffl House is offline   Reply With Quote