Penaltypalooza: 12/9/08: Nasvhille vs. Vancouver
View Single Post
12-10-2008, 11:15 PM
This is my boomstick
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chattanooga TN
Originally Posted by
Any hit that should have resulted in a penalty is "Dirty", this one should have resulted in 2. If you really want to argue whether or not a penalty should have been called, which in turn determines whether or not it was "dirty". Send your blurry Youtube screen captures to the nhl front office and you can argue with them since they have already said 2 infractions could have been enforced. Otherwise your just wasting our time.
thanks for coming around and providing us with a reason to keep talking about the DIRTY hit that resulted in a non-call that the league has already acknowledged.
Thank you very much for pointing out the obvious to our resident Canuck homer, who feels the need to defend his players to people who just do not care
. As for the hit, anyone that watches how how high he throws his elbow and then further sees the elevation of the hit (literally about 3 feet in the air) and connection of the elbow to Dumont's head, has to realistically say the hit was a dirty hit. It was a clear head-hunting maneuvar, which to me, is dirty.
- Enoch -
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Enoch