View Single Post
12-13-2008, 01:27 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,688
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by onice View Post
The assumption being that you do?

You have a clue no more than the poster that you're insulting. his is an opinion like yours.

I'm sure he bases his opinion on what he has seen so far from the kid. Making excuses that he's only 21 only points to the fact that he shouldn't have been in the NHL; it does not point to the fact that he'll somehow develop into a superior hockey player.

From what I've seen of Lats, I agree with the poster you insulted. I'll be very surprised to see him surpass a Kilger or, by some fluke, Ryder.
I never compare Latendresse to any established player because I understand that we have no clue...

I didn't make an assumption saying Latendresse is already a bust and won't have an nhl career...

He's 21yo and at that age most players are still in the AHL, so it's pretty hard to evaluate his future.

I wonder what you would have said about Ryder when he was 21yo playing in the ECHL...

MTL-rules is offline   Reply With Quote