View Single Post
Old
12-19-2008, 01:37 PM
  #21
Kaktus*
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 22,389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianFlyer88 View Post
I vote none of the above.

Reason #1: I believe Bouwmeester will cost more than any of those options. Maybe something like Lupul, Carle/Coburn, Giroux and Parent. He's going to be a hot commodity, so he won't be easily acquired by trading Florida a player no one here seems to want (Jones), a chronic underachiever (Lupul) and a potential late first round draft pick.
Whats wrong with trading Carle for someone like Bouwmeester? Or do you mean Carle, Giroux and Parent? No team will give up that much.

I voted Carle and Lupul and Parent or Carle and Lupul and 1st conditional.

Do people actually realize that Bouwmeester is top 10 d-men in the NHL in his prime?

If his contract demands are affordable how can anyone say no.

I mean all of us love Timonen, right? Well, Bouwmeester is 6.4 220lbs Timonen and 5-6 younger and can put someone like Malkin into the boards with out taking a penalty on every god damn shift.

Kaktus* is offline   Reply With Quote