Dale Purinton resigned
View Single Post
07-29-2004, 04:59 AM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Originally Posted by
Poti is more of a liability. Malacough was more of a liability. I am not advocating that Dale gets playing time intead of Kondratiev, Pock, or Tyutin, but let's not go overboard here.
And what is it that makes your OPINIONS facts, and others not? When used as a defenseman, Dale did fine as a #6/7. When Sather relagated him to role of a goon, playing him 2 minutes a night, his effectiveness decreased.
Malakhov and Poti added some offense -
Poti - gp 67 g 10 a 14 p 24 +/- -1
Malakhov - gp 71 g 3 a 14 p 17 +/- -7
Purinton - gp 40 g 1 a 1 p 2 +/- -9
Whilst Purniton has no offensive potential and was a -9. I know people are going to flame me for using stats but I feel in this case they are significant.
To be honest I hate Purinton and feel that there were better options available then a borderline AHL defenceman who's skating alone shows hes out of his depth at the NHL level.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BLACKBURN