View Single Post
Old
08-04-2004, 06:06 PM
  #23
shadoz19
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,769
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway
He is for two reasons:

1) He's cheaper than he was.

2) He is not the financial anchor with the Rangers that he was with the Caps and the Rangers don't have to trade him.

Not saying that the Rangers would get a package like the proposed one back but they would certainly do better than Anson Carter.
1) Still the same $6m/year when the Rangers acquired him.

2) I'll agree with you on this one.

shadoz19 is offline