Thread: News Article: Nathan McIver traded for Mike Brown
View Single Post
Old
02-04-2009, 05:51 PM
  #72
pitseleh
Registered User
 
pitseleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,645
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pauser View Post
They wanted McIver for the Moose...had they picked him off waivers they'd have to re-waive him to get him down there.

Good move. Glad Brown is finally gone.
Not if I'm reading the CBA correctly:

Quote:
13.22 When a Club claims a player on Regular, Re-Entry, or Unconditional Waivers, and, subsequently, in the same season it requests Waivers on the same Player and the original owning Club is the successful and only Club making a Waiver claim, then the original owning Club shall be entitled to Loan such Player to a club in another league within thirty days without further Waivers being asked; provided that such player has not participated in ten or more NHL Games (cumulative) and remained on an NHL roster more than thirty days (cumulative) following such a successful claim.
So because the Canucks would have been the only team to put in a claim they could have sent him straight down to the Moose. They traded Mike Brown for him on the off chance that some other team would put in a claim for McIver so that they wouldn't be able to send him down without offering him to them first.

pitseleh is offline   Reply With Quote