View Single Post
Old
08-25-2004, 08:30 PM
  #18
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 14,095
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge
well it depends on what you believe. If the rangers knew they were gonna get one of their guys at 6 then they might have felt comfortable staying where they were.

Personally I would have gone for Ladd at the cost of a second round pick. I could've done without Dane Byers if it meant getting Andrew Ladd.

I gotta admit that Ladd-Korpikoski would have been a nice one-two punch, but I also believe Montoya is an elite level prospect as well.
I'd agree. A stable of Jessiman, Ladd and Korpikoski would be an awfully nice way to build a foundation.

jas is offline