It says here Players talking of $60 million luxury tax threshold
View Single Post
09-04-2004, 09:21 PM
Join Date: Jun 2004
Originally Posted by
What some people don't seem to realize is that the current system makes some teams make hockey decisions because of money and others make hockey decisions because they make sense from a hockey perspective. What a cap would do would make each team balance hockey and money decisions rather than just a few teams. The current system has a number of factors which make salaries escalate which cannot be controled by gm's.
A cap would still make teams make decisons for monetary reasons, but in a backwards way. See my point about Iginla earlier in the thread.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hockeytown9321