It says here Players talking of $60 million luxury tax threshold
View Single Post
09-10-2004, 01:57 PM
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Walled Lake, Mi
Originally Posted by
Except the only argument people are giving me is that a cap is equally fair(or unfair) for everyone.
a world with no cap:
Niklas Lidstrom asks for 10 mil as he has been arguably the best dman in the last 5 - 10 years
only only a handful of teams could afford him right? does that make it unfair to the rest of the league?, i'd say so, wouldn't you?
a world with a cap:
Niklas Lidstrom asks for 10 mil, but has a counter offer of 6 - 7 mil as there's a whole team to be concerned about because cap space is limited
now, at least 15 teams could feasably afford that contract, the only things that could change would be bonuses and length of contract, either way that would keep 15 or more teams in the running for him. he still gets paid like a star, but salaries would be brought back to earth
another good dman who would ask for 7 mil would be told 'you're no lidstrom we'll give you x million, so on and so forth, a cap would still allow stars to be paid like stars, it would just stop some of the stupid offers made by GM's, while yes it does put a small limit to what each player can make, so what, if these players are playing for strictly monetary reasons then screw em, if more players would play for the love of the game then the fans would be treated to a better game night in and night out
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by garry1221