View Single Post
Old
09-11-2004, 01:39 PM
  #9
Russian Fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,475
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Russian Fan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad The Impaler
Uh... it's a negociation.

Obviously, the 40% figure goal is bunk.

Is there anyone out there who really believes that?

There is something you forget, though. You're saying a small correction might make all teams viable but it will probably not allow them all the means to be competitive. This is what the owners are attempting here. The plan being that if they fail, they should at least get viability.

Personally, I'm much more concerned about an equal playing field so I support the owners pushing for more.

Vlad you forget 1 thing & that's the most important. You can get a salary cap of 31M$ & still not be competitve if you're not hiring the RIGHT PEOPLE for the RIGHT JOB !!!

Equal playing field , what an illusion. Equal playing would mean equal GM's competency, equal Owner competency, equal staff competency.

Equal playing field in terms of a cap will only reward mediocrity like the NFL. I would expand on that but I'm a bit tired writing 2000 words & getting 7 words in return.

Russian Fan is offline