View Single Post
Old
09-12-2004, 03:39 PM
  #41
barrytrotzsneck
Retired Global Mod
 
barrytrotzsneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 31,022
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckhead
I can grant you that the newer franchises do atleast deserve a chance, but the L.A Kings, Anaheim, Sharks, Panthers, etc...Have had their chance. Tampa, yes they won the Cup, and that is no small feat, and look poised to be a threat again, but for the betterment of the league, how can so many teams be just holding on? Is it worth it for the rest of the teams to have to agree to a revenue sharing option that will only keep these teams afloat? and not make them stable. The league needs to take steps, however harsh they may be if it helps the sport.

but that's the point i keep making...you're under the illusion that it's JUST the southern\western teams that need revenue sharing. The Canadian teams that aren't called the Maple Leafs need it JUST as bad, if not more.

__________________
www.thepredatorial.com

barrytrotzsneck is offline