View Single Post
Old
04-13-2009, 12:25 AM
  #34
Prudentius
 
Prudentius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 699
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RushDP View Post
LMAO!! Why don't you just give it up already?

It's plain to see for anybody that isn't a conspiracy nutjob that the cops were targeted by the same guys that already had done exactly the same thing to them in the past. The papers also reported the very same information as well.

The only fool that is in complete denial and is naive enough to believe that a conspiracy was fabricated to cover up a riot is seemingly you. Everybody else here seems to think that there was a factual account of a criminal act except you Mulder.

High five for your completely ridiculous insistence on looking stupid.
My point is just that it looks a lot better for the police to say they were targeted by gang members(which they might have been) than just say out blank they lost control to a crowd due to their lack of preparation and competence. It doesn't mean nobody went there with a butane torch with intent to torch a few cars. It just mean that the majority of rioters were probably fans. I don't see why it's so hard to understand. A lot of cities riot when they win sports events. Don't see them blaming it on alleged criminal gangs all the time.

Drunken fans rioting in Montreal? Impossible.

It's all Montreal-North scums coming down to burn the city with butane torch. Go out.

Jesus.

Prudentius is offline