Thread: A thought
View Single Post
Old
09-17-2004, 10:08 AM
  #5
fan mao rong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: port royal , pa
Posts: 968
vCash: 500
Yeah, a 2-for-1 tax probably would do something to curb salaries. The union would call that a tax that has the effect of a cap. It would currently call that unacceptable, and they will for some time. And if the tax point is 40 million or so it is an increase over current salary levels, and does not help the lower revenue teams keep their players. The Eagle News thing, you must have only read the 1st part, because the 2nd half says there is a need for a new CBA because of the outflow of revenue to players and others. Every one knows they take in alot of revenue. Alot more goes out than comes in.

fan mao rong is offline