: Value of:
View Single Post
05-06-2009, 04:45 PM
Join Date: Aug 2008
Originally Posted by
I love this argument: Boston players aren't really good because Boston has good players.
Hemsky has put up pretty similar numbers on a stanley cup finalist team as he did this year on an early golf season team.
Michael Ryder had less goals last year than Penner did. The fact that he had a bounce back season is incredibly related to having Krejci as his center. And obviously you are right about not knowing Boston's lines because Lucic/Kessel/Bergeron didn't play with krejci.
Except for I did not say that, I said Penner and Horcoff are not real 1st liners, they aren't helping Hemsky's point production like all of the great Boston players are probably helping Krejci. Hemsky was 23 when he put up those numbers on the cup run team, Krejci is the same age, putting up the same numbers as Hemsky (when he was 23) on a potential Stanely Cup winning team.
Know one knows what made Ryder bounce back, it could have been Krejci, it could have been having Claude Julien back?
My point is that Kessel/Savard/Lucic/Wheeler/Ryder/Bergeron are all better players than Penner and Horcoff are, since you obviously dont hear what im sayin'.
View Public Profile
Joey Moss's albums
Find More Posts by Joey Moss