View Single Post
Old
09-25-2004, 05:32 PM
  #18
OlliMackBjugStud
Registered User
 
OlliMackBjugStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,717
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCoyotes
It's taken some time to catch on, but I had a lot of agreement in the past when I brought this up too. Glad to see I'm not the only one that can make the sense of it.

Just get me that direct line to Bettman & Goodenow, and I'll straighten it all out.

With all favortism to the idea aside since I came up with it, I truely believe it's a viable option that nearly addresses many of the problems from the previous CBA.
well, i think the owners would disagree. it has only a slight corelation to the revenues of the league and they are adamant that there is a strict relationship between revenues and player costs.

although, i think its a good middle ground.

dr

OlliMackBjugStud is online now