Trade - CAP for NON-GUARANTEED CONTRACTS
View Single Post
09-25-2004, 08:11 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Originally Posted by
yes its worthless.
well it certainly isnt "status quo".
the owners are free to negotiate those #'s. why dont they say "ok, lets use your model, with these changes:
- 30% roll back
- only teams can take players to arbitration
- 50% qualifying offers
- $3 for $1 on a luxury tax at 30m"
im not suggesting the above #'s are the right #'s, im simply pointing out that the owners could at least find a way to negotiate at least the #'s in the players proposal ?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by OlliMackBjugStud