ok, a cap compromise - from GoCoyotes
View Single Post
09-27-2004, 01:21 AM
Join Date: May 2004
Originally Posted by
While this proposal sounds like a reasonable deal, it punishes the market value of players for what they can't even control - getting traded. Under this proposal a player's earning potential would drop significantly if he was unfortunate enough to get traded. Not exactly fair, in my opinion, and I don't think the player would agree to it for this reason.
He'd only be worried about his market value as an un-restricted free-agent, right. If he's a free agent, he'll be a cap hit regardless, right? Maybe I'm mis-understanding either you or the proposed system.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by rt