Proposal: Soft cap + Luxury Tax + Revenue Sharing
View Single Post
09-28-2004, 08:39 AM
Join Date: Jun 2002
Originally Posted by
Where are the player concessions in this proposal?
The concession is that it's not a hard cap.
Effectively what you are saying is soft cap, but any monies from luxury tax are from owner to owner, same with the revenue sharing.
Are you actually suggesting that revenue should be shared with the players? :lol
Is there player rollback in salaries contained in your proposal?
With some work could work but even as the NHLPA said it would not approve a luxury tax system that is to confiscatory to the players. So not only do they not want a cap they really don't want a very disciplined luxury tax system.
Too damn bad.
View Public Profile
Visit degroat*'s homepage!
Find More Posts by degroat*