Thread: Proposal: Philly TB Minn
View Single Post
Old
05-12-2009, 03:45 AM
  #30
Philadelphia Flames
Registered User
 
Philadelphia Flames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 846
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by State of Hockey View Post
No, a first is borderline not enough. Harding is a former high 2nd rounder that's developed, ready, and has been highly successful at every level so far. Are you telling me that an unproven, not ready, no-guarantee-at-all late 1st rounder is worth more than a ready, proven, high 2nd rounder AND a 4th?

By the way, Minnesota goalies look good because they are good. Ask any Wild fan if Harding has had an easy time with the Wild. They'll all say that he has not. He commonly gets back-to-backs, a very high shot count, and little goal support. Last year Harding gave up 8 goals against Dallas and his coach thought he played a good game. Chew on that.


Enjoy your continued goalie problems then.


Very fair for Philly. You should be jumping all over a goalie of Harding's caliber AND a draft pick for a low first.


Not enough value if history repeats itself.


Almost any trade for quality ends up being that way. But that's a heckuva a lot of quality and quantity for Minnesota to give up.


Trade values for somewhat unproven goalies with high potential are huge. That's why they're not traded very often. They're that valuable. When they are, like Mike Smith or Vesa Toskala, the return is big.
Wow. How many times does history actually repeat itself? Any team would be stupid to deal their first for Harding. I'd rather have goalie problems than do that deal. Harding caliber as what? so far he's just been a backup. Either just Lupul for Harding or keep enjoying your offensive problems.

Philadelphia Flames is offline   Reply With Quote