Thread: Dane Byers
View Single Post
Old
10-01-2004, 05:34 PM
  #2
Kubera55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 323
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ1982
Just curious, but does anyone actually believe this guy was a good second round pick? I would have preferred a guy with a bit more upside. To me Byers is a less talented version of Ben Eager who also brings less toughness, and I don't think Eager will ever be more than a 3rd liner. Why couldn't we grab a guy like Lisin, Sindel, Tobin or even Karsums (very talented but small)? They were all available.
Someone saw something they liked.

I mean, Bruce Graham was supposed to be a borderline 1st rounder, but he got drafted later. Olver was considered like a fourth or fifth round pick and the Rangers took him even higher.

Basically I think he has good size and decent physical tools. People differ on how much he's willing to use those tools. But the Rangers already have an enormous number of smurfs... taking a shot on some size is almost never a bad idea. Particularly not when you have all those picks and it's just a 2nd rounder . . .

Kubera55 is offline