Thread: Proposal: LA-Boston Proposal
View Single Post
Old
05-31-2009, 04:07 PM
  #29
Dr Quincy
Registered User
 
Dr Quincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 17,425
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doughty Number 8 View Post
As for the original trade proposal, Rask really isn't much better (and far less NHL proven) than Quick, we have a multitude of other goaltending prospects, we don't need a guy like Ference, and Frolov is simply much, much better than Kobasew.

Not to mention that you throw Johnson in as well

Simply a terrible proposal, really really bad. Like, probably the worst I have seen that was a serious poster
Read it again. I didn't propose it, and I agree with most of what you say.

My one difference is on the Quick/Rask comparison. Quick does have more NHL experience, but I do think Rask will be a better goalie. Look, I like Quick a lot and have for years. He played prep school very close to where relatives of mine live so I've been aware of him since then. Plus he played college hockey at my alma mater. I like him a lot. However, I do think Bernier is the better long term prospect and i think Rask is (slightly) better than Bernier.

That's my opinion.

Dr Quincy is offline   Reply With Quote