Thread: Value of: Jake Gardiner to Toronto?
View Single Post
Old
05-31-2009, 09:50 PM
  #30
EucaLEAFtys
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In the Underdark
Posts: 2,332
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vipers31 View Post
Yes and no. Around the deadline you could see the Ducks weren't thinking in the two dimensions of "rebuild" vs "win now". They felt some changes were due and needed to be made and they did so. Whitney's addition was a necessary move as they had the grand total of one defenseman (Pronger) signed for the 09-10 campaign at the time, so adding a defenseman under contract was a major concern. At the deadline they also added Wisniewski in return for Sami Pahlsson and two nice prospects from the Sharks for Travis Moen and Kent Huskins - if they were only focussing on a deep run right now, those are trades they probably would not have done. The Ducks are not trying to somehow squeeze in another run within some alleged "cup window" (a term I don't like very much), they try to be able to address needs while looking to stay competetive in the long run.
All Valid points.

Even with the new prospects from the San Jose deal, if a Gardiner-Stralman swap were to occur, Stralman would likely end up simply replacing Gardiner at the top of the list and could also help the Ducks for a very long time.

EucaLEAFtys is offline   Reply With Quote