Thread: News Article: NHL 10 worst contracts.. Briere #6
View Single Post
06-15-2009, 11:36 PM
Juicy Couturier*
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 4,910
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Juicy Couturier*
Originally Posted by flyboys15 View Post
Huet prob beats Lupul for 11 and Kimmo's contract has been worth every penny. You could make a better argument for Hartnell's contract but I wouldn't, you're kind of just a silly person for saying that.
As much as Kimmo is the man now and hes the best player on the team, hes going to be 38 when that contract expires and to be paying a 37 or 38 year old dman 6.4 million is kind of scary. Right now we all love it but we might not be loving it so much in 2 years when hes 36 and making 6.4 million while we are desperately trying to sign Gagne, Carter, Giroux and Spisa all in one summer. Kimmo has been mentioned very often as having a bad contract, this isnt the first time.

Honestly, I wouldnt mind moving him for a younger dman if we had the chance(Kimmo + for someone like phaneuf). Only because that contract could really suck in 2 years when he might not be good enough to be the rock of the first pairing.

Juicy Couturier* is offline   Reply With Quote