Thread: Proposal: Canucks offer for a top pick
View Single Post
Old
06-21-2009, 11:51 PM
  #63
TrueCanuckle
Registered User
 
TrueCanuckle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 349
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7ark View Post
According to your posts, Hodgson is going to have a better career, and Tavares is useless if not scoring, but you'd still take Tavares over Hodgson in this draft? Why on earth would you do that, if your believe your own rhetoric?

Tavares at the very least will likely play in the NHL at 18, something CoHo the Almighty couldn't accomplish. Again, I am not ragging on Hodgson, he'll be a great player, just not the best player in the league like a Dats and certainly not one of the best all time like a Francis(old comp I know, I haven't seen a nuck fan use it in a while)
this guy oviously has issues... why do you think its SOOOOO important a player starts in the NHL at 18? does that make the player better if he starts at 18? NO
and no, gillis is a brillient GM for not letting him in the NHL, and to let him have another year of conditioning... take stamkos as a example!!

TrueCanuckle is offline   Reply With Quote