Balsillie/Phoenix Part IX: 'Dorf on Hockey
View Single Post
06-25-2009, 12:15 PM
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maroons Rd.
Originally Posted by
Please identify the provision where the NHL did not comply with its restrictions in the Boots "saga". I have reviewed it and could not see anything, but i would be interested in receiving information to the contrary.
I guess it's arguable given that the loans to Boots were made by owners of member clubs and not the clubs themselves, but the loans did appear to at least violate the spirit of sub-Article 8.1 (b):
8.1 Conflicting Interests and Loans
(b) No member shall, directly on indirectly, loan money to or become a surety or guarantor for...any other member of the League.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MAROONSRoad