View Single Post
06-25-2009, 12:15 PM
f/k/a Ghost
MAROONSRoad's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maroons Rd.
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,069
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by GSC2k2 View Post
Please identify the provision where the NHL did not comply with its restrictions in the Boots "saga". I have reviewed it and could not see anything, but i would be interested in receiving information to the contrary.
I guess it's arguable given that the loans to Boots were made by owners of member clubs and not the clubs themselves, but the loans did appear to at least violate the spirit of sub-Article 8.1 (b):

8.1 Conflicting Interests and Loans

(b) No member shall, directly on indirectly, loan money to or become a surety or guarantor for...any other member of the League.

MAROONSRoad is offline