View Single Post
Old
06-27-2009, 03:01 PM
  #49
CCF23
Registered User
 
CCF23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Richmond, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,779
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to CCF23
None of that changes my point, though. Actually reading what I'm saying might come in handy when you try to debate it.

Fact: In our elimination game we got schooled by a 5 foot 9 Pat Kane.

Fact: Jordan Schroeder was the consensus BPA on the board with our pick.

Schroeder is 5 foot 8 or so...So of course the "average" height of our first 2 picks (who averages 2 numbers anyway?) is going to be a little low. I'm still wanting to hear who we should've taken over Schroeder.

I'm not arguing taking bigger players is a bad idea. I'm saying Schroeder was clearly the BPA who just happens to be short...When you draft someone that's 5 foot 8 of course if you "average" the first 2 or 3 picks the number is going to be a little low.

What I want to know is:

1) Why are you averaging the height of TWO picks?

2) Do you disagree with taking Schroeder?

CCF23 is offline   Reply With Quote