Why is Gretzky known as the best?
View Single Post
10-20-2004, 02:05 PM
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halfway between Nothing and Not Much Else
Originally Posted by
The results do not lie. Teams from the Western Conference did not play in the finals for years until the conference playoffs were reinstated.
No way do I see Gretzky or those Oiler teams doing what they did as an Eastern Conference team. Which is why I see Lemieux and Bossy's numbers as more significant because you cannot win playing that style in this conference.
This is how the "East Coast bias" thing gets started. Incidentally the Pens did pretty good with that style in the early 90's. Ditto the Nords and Habs in the late 80's. Boston had no problem running and gunning in the 70's did they?
Western conference teams whom he had more chance to do damage against playing them more often in 762 regular season games Gretz scored 1583 pts. An average of 2.08 PPG.
Eastern conference in regular season games he managed a paltry 1116 pts in 611 games. An average of 1.82 PPG.
The difference is a mere .26 PPG. As an aside the team that fared best against him? The Buffalo Sabres. The worst? The Quebec Nordiques/Colorado Avalanche.
I'm a fan of the Montreal Canadiens, and Eastern Conference team and a power for the bulk of the 80's. But my boys could not stop Gretzky. Bob Gainey could not stop Gretzky, neither could Guy Carbonneau; both of whom are regarded as some of the best defensive forwards the game has ever seen.
I agree with you, the styles of hockey in the two conferences do favor certain types of player, Val Bure or Vince Damphousse are good examples of that. But for Gretzky it made a negligible difference, if any at all.
Last edited by Malefic74: 10-20-2004 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Malefic74