View Single Post
Old
10-25-2004, 12:56 AM
  #4
Rodent
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: On your dinner plate
Posts: 590
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balej20
If replacement players are allowed to play for the NHL...which Ranger prospects would be allowed to play? All of them that do not have NHL contracts, right?
As mentioned in the post above mine, "anybody" would be eligible to play if the envisioned "union-busting" scenario goes down. There are some limitations due to exisitng agreements with IIHF, AHL, Juniors, etc.

For that to occur, there must be a strike by the NHLPA, which is not what is happening currently. There is a labor lockout, which means that until a state of "impasse" is accepted by the NLRB, no players may work for the NHL, regardless of where they're from or whether they belong to IIHF, let alone NHLPA.

Should the NLRB determine that the owners are entitled to declare an "impasse", only then are owners free to unilaterally draft a new CBA and ram it down the NHLPA's collective throat. Then ownership implements a schedule and sets about hiring replacement players.

At that point the NHLPA has a choice to make:

1) Accept the CBA and go back to work
2) Go on strike.

If the NHLPA goes on strike, ownership is then legally entitled to hire any players it wishes consistent with existing agreements it has with IIHF, AHL, Juniors, etc. Non-union players who sign contracts are called "scabs". Union players who cross the picket line are called "dead meat".

Rodent is offline