View Single Post
10-27-2004, 01:12 AM
Registered User
PecaFan's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ottawa (Go 'Nucks)
Posts: 8,925
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by jiggs 10
Agree, except for "steroids" Bonds over Ruth. No way, never! Barry Bonds is not even the best player in his generation, let alone one of the top 100 of all-time. Bonds did very little of value until 1994, when he started on the 'roids (as ANYONE with eyes can see) after being traded from Pittsburgh.
Sorry, but that's just idiotic. You're obviously totally biased against the man.

Bonds won THREE LEAGUE MVP awards *before* 1994. And he should have been 4 for 4, had not some sentimental votes gone Terry Pendleton's way. Not to mention the four Gold Gloves, and leading the league in On Base Percentage, Slugging, OPS, Walks, RBI's, and Home Runs numerous times during those years.

PecaFan is offline