View Single Post
Old
08-04-2009, 12:08 PM
  #102
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,698
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Da Vinci Chode View Post
so six of the rangers twelve forwards did not play for them last year? thats absolutely pathetic. sather is the reason the rangers will not win another stanley cup. you build a team by adding maybe two or three players in the offseason. you don't revamp your team especially when your team nearly won their series. sather is an idiot
Da Vinci Code is a lousy book by the way.

In response to what you're saying though you have to be happy with your core. On your team there is more reason to be and if Renney were still here--there probably wouldn't be so many changes. Tortorella though was not happy with a number of players and with the overall conditioning of the team he inherited. The Rangers as well were too small and not aggressive enough to compete seriously with the better teams. The Rangers as well have a lot coming from their farm system--a lot more than the Devils by the way--though some of what's coming probably won't work out as well as we hope. Even so--we have the deepest group of prospects I ever remember us having (and I've been a Rangers fan since the early 70's)--at least apart from in goal. For instance looking at our D and not including Staal and Girardi--we have 9 guys who have a reasonable to excellent shot at becoming NHL defensemen--Gilroy, Sanguinetti, MDZ, Heikkinen, Potter, McDonagh, Valentenko, Kundratek and Williams.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote