View Single Post
08-14-2009, 10:34 AM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,811
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Manhattan Blue View Post
There is one fact in this thread that cannot be ignored:

Brad Richards is the player we hope Brandon Dubinsky will become.

There is one opinion that dominates this thread:

Brandon Dubinsky will be just as good or even better (with his intangibles ) than Brad Richards.

There is one item of interest that no one takes into account:

By the time the latter happens (Dubinsky proves to be on the level of Richards) he will (a) have aged and will no longer be the appealing, strapping 23 year old he is now, and (b) worked his way up to a salary close to Richards'. Because after all, he is worth the 2 million or so right now he's rumored to be demanding.

So, my question is this. Does it really matter if we speed things up a bit and get the 28 year old, proven set up man rather than wait the 4 years to see if our own can get there?

To me it doesn't. Those who say different are IMO stroking their need for all players young. Younger = Better. Pro sports doesn't necessarily work like that.
Dominates the thread? Its been said that Dubinsky and Richards are on an even plain maybe once or twice, and that opinion is misguided. Richards is certainly the better player at this point.

Most are against a Richards deal because they realize how stupid it is to give up assets AND have almost 30 million tied up in 4 players for at least the next 3 years.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote