P.K. Subban VS Thomas Hickey
View Single Post
08-23-2009, 12:04 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Originally Posted by
Thomas Hickey is a complete defense man.
P.K Subban is one-dimensional.
Of course Subban is going to outscore Hickey. Stats are pointless. WJR? There's a reason why Hickey was named Captain. He would dependable in all situations. Subban was only a PP specialist.
Even then, when you look at the stats. It's relatively close despite Hickey being more of a role player.
PK Subban will probably be at best a 5/6 PP specialist /bust to europe.
Thomas Hickey who will likely be a top 4 defense man in the NHL.
No need to debate, Just watch. Watch them next year. Hickey already put up 7 points in 7 AHL games, which is already an impressive feat. Let see how Subban faces men in the AHL rather than boys who can't match against speed.
Subban is far from one-dimensional....he hits...his defensive game has improved alot from his draft year as well. It's not easy getting around him at all.
And how was P.K. a PP specialist at the WJ? He played every situation in the most important games of the tourney (U.S., Semi's and GMG)..
But I love your crystal ball. How many times have you seen him play? I'm guessing not too often.
And wait...stats are pointless? Oh I see..ok..so it was pointless that Ovechkin led the league in goals. Of course, he isn't a good goal scorer...what am I thinking..
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by chaosrevolver